A new 7 spectral band scanner, called the Thematic Mapper, was/is the prime instrument on Landsats 4, 5, and 6. This improved sensor system includes a blue band so that quasi-natural color images can be made, two bands in the mid-IR, and a thermal band. System resolution is increased to 30 meters. Landsat 7 carried a single sensor, the ETM+, which has a panchromatic band that achieves 15 m resolution. The ability of the TM to better identify materials and classes is demonstrated.

### History of Remote Sensing: Landsat's Thematic Mapper (TM)

A more sophistical multispectral imaging sensor, named the Thematic Mapper (TM) has been added to Landsats 4 (1982), 5 (1984), 6 (this last failed to attain orbit during launch and thus has never returned data) and 7 (1999). These TMs flew on redesigned, more advanced platforms, the first of which, Landsat-4 (D before launch) is pictured below:

Although similar in operational modes to the MSS (which was also part of the Landsat 4 and 5 payloads, to maintain continuity), the TM consists of 7 bands that have these characteristics:

Band No. | Wavelength Interval (µm) | Spectral Response | Resolution (m)
1 | 0.45 - 0.52 | Blue-Green | 30
2 | 0.52 - 0.60 | Green | 30
3 | 0.63 - 0.69 | Red | 30
4 | 0.76 - 0.90 | Near IR | 30
5 | 1.55 - 1.75 | Mid-IR | 30
6 | 10.40 - 12.50 | Thermal IR | 120
7 | 2.08 - 2.35 | Mid-IR | 30

Six reflectance bands obtain their effective resolution at a nominal orbital altitude of 705 km (438 miles) through an IFOV of 0.043 mrad. The seventh band is the thermal channel, which has an IFOV of 0.172 mrad.

This diagram shows the placement of each band on a wavelength base:

This is a photograph of the Thematic Mapper on the ground before it was mated to the spacecraft. Note the gold leaf that is used to shield the inner workings.

This cutaway diagram shows the major components of the TM system:

The sketch below shows some of the components in the optical train and detector layout of the TM.

Instead of the 24 detectors on the MSS, the TM has a total of 96 for the reflective bands (16 each for a band; the mirror scan produces 16 lines at once) and 4 for the thermal band. At any given IFOV, each detector views a slightly different part of the ground that will be represented in the pixel being activated by radiation at any instant. The radiation collected for each band passes through a scan line corrector which compensates for the forward motion of the spacecraft. Radiation comprising Bands 1 through 4 are sensed by silicon detectors located in one focal plane. Bands 5 and 7, in the Mid IR (SWIR) use InSb detectors and Band 6 used a HgCdTe detector; radiation from all three are sent to a second focal plane. Bands 5, 6, and 7 are subjected to a radiative cooling system to improve sensitivity.

To introduce you to the differences in a TM image shown in all seven bands, we take a quick look at a scene in Florida:

Band 1 is superior to the MSS band 4 in detecting some features in water. It also allows us to form quasi-natural color composites. Band 5 is sensitive to variations in water content, both in leafy vegetation and as soil moisture. It also distinguishes between clouds (appearing dark) and bright snow (light). This band also responds to variations in ferric iron (Fe2 O3) content in rocks and soils, which show higher reflectances as the iron content increases. Band 7 likewise reacts to moisture contents and is especially suited to detecting hydrous minerals (such as clays or certain alteration products) in geologic settings. Band 6 can distinguish a radiant temperature difference of about 0.6° C and is helpful in discriminating rock types whose thermal properties show differences in temperatures near their surface. It often can pick out changes in ground temperatures due to moisture variation and can single out vegetation due to its evaporative cooling effect. The higher resolution achieved in the reflective bands is a significant aid in picking out features and classes whose minimum dimension is usually on the order of 30 m (98 ft) . Thus, it can often discern houses and smaller buildings, which were unresolvable in MSS images.

The size and shape of full TM images from Landsats 4 and 5 are identical to the MSS images. At first glance, the quality and characteristics of these full scene TM images seem similar to those made by the MSS after optimal computer-based processing, but on closer inspection they do appear sharper. This apparent similarity is due to the need to resample the TM images for TV monitor displays (which are not high resolution systems capable of reproducing all TM pixels) by dropping some pixels. The influence of the better TM resolution (when un-resampled) becomes apparent whenever photographs of full scenes are enlarged (pictures more than a meter on a side can be produced with exceptional clarity) or subscenes are extracted and enlarged.

Primary Author: Nicholas M. Short, Sr. email: nmshort@ptd.net